BankerNotes
Comparison

Atlas Technology Group vs Hampleton Partners

Comparing two boutique M&A advisors · Last updated April 11, 2025

AttributeAtlas Technology GroupHampleton Partners
TypeTech boutiqueTech boutique
HQBoston, MALondon, UK
Founded20072007
Sector focusSoftware, TechTech, Software
Deal size$10M-$100M$10M-$200M
Senior team
  • Jim Brodo
    Managing Director
  • Miro Parizek
    Founder, Principal Partner
Rating Locked Locked
Reviews0 verified0 verified

Choosing between Atlas Technology Group and Hampleton Partners

Atlas Technology Group and Hampleton Partners both work in Software, Tech. Founders running a sell-side process in those categories often see both names on their advisor longlist, which is why this comparison comes up. Both firms position themselves as tech boutique advisors, so the choice is less about category and more about pattern recognition, senior attention, and process fit.

Atlas Technology Group is headquartered in Boston, MA and was founded in 2007, while Hampleton Partners operates out of London, UK and was founded in 2007. Geography matters here: Atlas Technology Group's Boston relationships and Hampleton Partners's London relationships will overlap on national strategics but diverge on the regional private equity buyer set most likely to push price. On deal-size focus, Atlas Technology Group states $10M-$100M while Hampleton Partners states $10M-$200M.

For founders deciding between Atlas Technology Group and Hampleton Partners, the honest recommendation is to take a working session with each named partner before signing. Read the firm-level reviews on BankerNotes for the pattern that matters most: did the partner who pitched the mandate run the buyer calls and final negotiations, or did the work slide down the org chart by week six. That pattern, more than league-table position, is what separates a good outcome from a mediocre one.

Firm A profile
Atlas Technology Group
Boston, MA

Atlas Technology Group is a tech boutique headquartered in Boston, MA and founded in 2007. The firm focuses on Software, Tech and typically advises on transactions in the $10M-$100M range. Key dealmakers include Jim Brod...

Read the Atlas Technology Group profile and reviews
Firm B profile
Hampleton Partners
London, UK

Hampleton Partners is a tech boutique headquartered in London, UK and founded in 2007. The firm focuses on Tech, Software and typically advises on transactions in the $10M-$200M range. Key dealmakers include Miro Parizek...

Read the Hampleton Partners profile and reviews

Frequently asked questions

What is the main difference between Atlas Technology Group and Hampleton Partners?
Atlas Technology Group is a tech boutique HQ'd in Boston, MA (founded 2007), focused on Software, Tech, with a typical deal range of $10M-$100M. Hampleton Partners is a tech boutique HQ'd in London, UK (founded 2007), focused on Tech, Software, with a typical deal range of $10M-$200M. Beyond those facts, the most reliable differentiator is senior banker attention, which BankerNotes reviews are designed to surface.
Which firm has better founder reviews, Atlas Technology Group or Hampleton Partners?
Atlas Technology Group's current rating is Locked (reviews unlock after five verified founders submit ratings). Hampleton Partners's current rating is Locked (reviews unlock after five verified founders submit ratings). Read the individual firm profiles for the full review breakdown.
Should I shortlist both Atlas Technology Group and Hampleton Partners?
For most founders evaluating sell-side advisors with overlapping sector and deal-size fit, putting both on a shortlist is reasonable. The point of a bake-off is to test how the senior team behaves under pressure, how the firm shapes the buyer universe, and how it handles a difficult diligence question. Treat the shortlist as an interview, not a beauty contest.
How does BankerNotes verify reviews of Atlas Technology Group and Hampleton Partners?
Every review is submitted by a founder who confirms they hired the firm as their sell-side advisor. We verify the reviewer privately using work email, LinkedIn, and approximate engagement timing. The verified identity is never published. Only the rating, written review, and a generic sector label appear on the public page.

Related advisor comparisons

Browse sectors covered

Last updated: April 11, 2025